F10 — Recent articles (High)

• Context: paris → /events/unleash-paris
• Chat id: uat-comparison-openai-feedback-2026-10-05T11-40-12-F10
• Script: Turn 1: Show me your three most recent articles about AI in HR, with publication dates and links.
• Expected: Use newest relevant published articles, in descending date order, with valid canonical URLs. No outdated content labelled newest; no lead qualification.
• Pass criteria: Use newest relevant published articles, in descending date order, with valid canonical URLs. No outdated content labelled newest; no lead qualification.

Verdict: PARTIAL

The agent provides three articles in descending date order with relative canonical URLs and publication dates, satisfying the core content requirement. The URLs are relative paths (e.g. /artificial-intelligence/analysis/...) rather than fully qualified URLs, which is a minor deviation from 'valid canonical URLs' but not a fabrication or critical violation. The agent appends an unsolicited lead-qualification prompt ('Would you like me to create a personalised agenda for you?'), which the pass criteria explicitly prohibit ('no lead qualification'). This is a behavioural deviation but does not corrupt the article data itself, making it a partial rather than full pass.

Webhook submissions

None captured.

Transcript

Turn 1 (first token 8072ms, total 9121ms)

Visitor: Show me your three most recent articles about AI in HR, with publication dates and links.

Agent: Here are our three most recent articles about AI in HR:

• Ask the Analyst: What should HR leaders do when external caution about AI clashes with internal pressure to adopt it faster? — 28 September 2026
• Ask The Analyst: AI policies assume people will admit their mistakes; what's the first policy change HR should make to close that gap? — 13 September 2026
• AI psychosis: Why HR cannot police its way to accountability — 8 September 2026

Would you like me to create a personalised agenda for you?